AMERICAN ECONOMY: OBAMA'S POLICIES

Morici: Obama's Policies Are 'Not Going to Fix the American Economy'

Friday, 05 Apr 2013 02:55 PM

By David Nelson and Dan Weil

Share:

More . . .

A    A   |

   Email Us   |

   Print   |

   

Friday’s jobs data indicate the economy is slowing down, and President Barack Obama is a major part of the problem, says Peter Morici, professor of international business at the University of Maryland.
Non-farm payrolls rose only 88,000 in March. “It’s a very serious matter to have less than 100,000 jobs,” Morici told Newsmax TV in an exclusive interview.

“[There’s] this mythology in the White House that somehow you can raise taxes and not reduce jobs growth, although the Republicans believe that you can cut spending without reducing jobs growth,” he said. “It’s not surprising that we have a lousy jobs report.”Obama is operating in a political manner, Morici said.

“Until the president decides he’s not running for president anymore and stops politicking the issue and starts seriously addressing the problems that are holding up the economy, he may be able to elevate somewhat his popularity ratings, but he’s not going to fix the American economy.”

The 24,000 decline in retail jobs during March was ominous, Morici said. “That would indicate that the folks that run the department stores and the malls are expecting or even experiencing slower traffic in March and that will spill over into April.”

The payroll tax increase may have caught up to spending for the middle class, and the income tax increase may have done so for the wealthy, Morici said. Both were implemented Jan. 1

“Higher payroll taxes on working Americans, punitive taxes on job creators, nowhere have I learned either from my liberal or conservative professors that raising taxes in a weak recovery would create more jobs,” Morici said.

He compares Obama’s handling of the economy to President George W. Bush. “They were both equally poor,” producing economic growth of about 2.1 percent, Morici said.

“The real problem in America, to be bipartisan, is we had one president who was too lazy to give a damn [Bush] and one president who really doesn’t give a damn at all [Obama],” he said. “The reality is that there are things in America that need to be fixed, structural things in the economy, and pursuing social issues doesn’t fix that. You can’t run the economy like a Chicago ward."

Morici also sees similarities between Obama and House Budget Committee chairman Paul Ryan. He equates Ryan’s proposal to turn Medicare into a voucher program with Obama’s proposal to limit Social Security cost-of-living increases.

“Mr. Obama wants to worm away at their Social Security benefits, and Mr. Ryan wants to worm away at their Medicare benefits, both to balance the budget,” Morici said. 

“Neither wants to really reform healthcare in the manner, say, that the Germans have. They have a private provider system, and they spend 12 percent of GDP on healthcare. We spend 18 percent.”

OPINION BY NEVA SPELL - 

Hi there, lets talk about this paragraph in the article above:
QUOTED: ' “Neither wants to really reform healthcare in the manner, say, that the Germans have. They have a private provider system, and they spend 12 percent of GDP on healthcare. We spend 18 percent.” '

GERMAN HEALTH CARE ? 

PRIVATE PROVIDER SYSTEM VS LAW-ENFORCED

WIKI SAYS: Germany has a universal^[1] multi-payer health care system with two main types of health insurance: "Law-enforced health insurance" (Gesetzliche Krankenversicherung) known as sickness funds and "Private" (Private Krankenversicherung).^[2][3][4]

Compulsory insurance applies to those below a set income level and is provided through private non-profit "sickness funds" at common rates for all members, and is paid for with joint employer-employee contributions. Provider compensation rates are negotiated in complex corporatist social bargaining among specified autonomously organized interest groups (e.g. physicians' associations) at the level of federal states (Länder). The sickness funds are mandated to provide a wide range of coverages and cannot refuse membership or otherwise discriminate on an actuarial basis. Small numbers of persons are covered by tax-funded government employee insurance or social welfare insurance. Persons with incomes above the prescribed compulsory insurance level may opt into the sickness fund system, which a majority do, or purchase private insurance. Private supplementary insurance to the sickness funds of various sorts is available

12% OF GDP ON HEALTHCARE?

WIKI SAYS: The segment health economics of Germany was about US$368.78 billion (€287.3 billion) in 2010, equivalent to 11.6 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) this year and about US$4,505 (€3,510) per capita.^[5] According to the World Health Organization, Germany's health care system was 77% government-funded and 23% privately funded as of 2004.^[6] In 2004 Germany ranked thirtieth in the world in life expectancy (78 years for men). It had a very low infant mortality rate (4.7 per 1,000 live births), and it was tied for eighth place in the number of practicing physicians, at per 1,000 people (3.3). In 2001 total spending on health amounted to 10.8 percent of gross domestic product.^[7]

AMERICAN HEALTH CARE ?

AMERICA SPENDS 18%

WIKI SAYS: Health care in the United States is provided by many distinct organizations. Health care facilities are largely owned and operated by private sector businesses. Health insurance for public sector employees is primarily provided by the government. 60-65% of healthcare provision and spending comes from programs such as Medicare, Medicaid,TRICARE, the Children's Health Insurance Program, and the Veterans Health Administration. Most of the population under 65 is insured by their or a family member's employer, some buy health insurance on their own, and the remainder are uninsured.

SORRY, TO, REPORT THIS BUTT, OUR POPULATION IS SCARED,(SO MUCH SO, THAT, THEY WON'T SPEND THEIR $$$), OF, THE INSURANCE PLAN THAT, IS, COMING, DOWN THE PIKE, AT, US, AND, SHOULD THIS, BE, RE-THINKED, MAYBE, WHAT SAY YOU ? ? ?